Saturday, June 18, 2011

"V" is for Verne


Ok so I am skipping again a bit. I don't remember how I ended up reading this one - it was on the list, formally for what letter I don't remember, Ill check at a later date. In any case, I actually finished this book at least a month ago, and am just now updating.

Around the World in Eighty Days was a fun book that read really fast. This is in mind definitely an "adventure" book, in that the fun parts of the book are the crazy escapades the characters take on, not the characters themselves. That's also the drawback of this book, you don't get to know the characters very well and I tend to enjoy character driven plots more myself.

******spoilers*********

The whole point of the book, the journey around the world, was taken up on a bet, which seemed somewhat implausible and a very bored rich white male thing, though I did like the balancing of the attitude of the protagonist "just getting it done" with all of the things that accidentally come up to disrupt the journey that other characters throw into the mix. I especially enjoyed the detective, Fix, who follows them for most of the journey. Ok, I don't want to give too much away, but its a fun little read.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

"N" is for Narayan


I should have finished this book quite some time ago, it was a pleasant, easy read. "Man eater of Malgudi" is written in a simple concise style. One of my favorite things about any good book is getting connected with the characters - if Im not invested in them a book is much less interesting to me. This book got you interested in the characters (I wouldn't go so far as invested), you wanted to know what happens, particularly to the antagonist, Vasu. Vasu was SO OBNOXIOUS. I had to read ahead to make sure he got his comeuppance, thats how annoying this man was. But that shows Narayan is a good writer, he made me want to know.

This book takes place in Southern India, which also added to its interest. It was set in post Ghandi India and makes many references to the changing and growing economy of Indian in that era, and with the traditional culture and Hindu belief system, so I found that fun and interesting. A edition with illustrations, even minor, would have made this a really fun book for me.

Isn't this cover beautiful? Mine was plain, alas.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

"L" is for Loos

So my "L" book was "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes" from which the famous Marilyn Monroe movie was based. I never actually watched the movie, but I thought reading the book it was based on might be fun.

How wrong I was.

I couldn't even make it through the first chapter.

The book is the diary of a "lady in society" published in the 1920s. Basically, she's a kept woman - and thats what the first 12 pages of the book were about. I get it that this was culturally acceptable at the time, but I couldn't take it. All the "oh well, since a man is paying for a woman's education for some reason I suppose I should quit the job he doesn't like" was just more than I could take. I've read plenty of books where the women had to conform to rules I didn't like, or acted and thought in ways I didn't agree with, but rarely has it annoyed me so much, I had to stop reading. Usually I can deal, people are shaped by the times right? Sometimes they are conscious of the forces shaping their lives, sometimes not but this book was too much.

So thats the end of my "L" book.

It did have cool illustrations.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Follow up on "J" is for Jonson

I was never able to track this down at the UWM or Milwaukee Public Library (at least not the one on the East side) but I WAS able to get it for free on Kindle, woot@ woot!

This one did take me a bit to get through, even though it actually read quite quickly. I finished it on the Caribbean cruise I went on with Justin's family - I just took an afternoon to sit on the deck of our room and read, one of my favorite vacation activities. And in honor of the challenge, WHICH I AM APPARENTLY THE ONLY ONE STILL BLOGGING ABOUT, but I digress, I decided to plough through and finish it up.

Again, I will excerpt from my goodreads.com review:

"I realized at the end I had been misconceptualizing the purpose/point of this book. The title says it all: by the end of the book, he is an ex-colored man, aka, he is living as a white man.

On the whole I don't feel like its a terribly interesting book, its fair. I did enjoy the end, when he sums of his life experience and his decision to "pass" as white, I found it interesting how cognizant he was of the many and multiple implications of his choice, but how the practical consequences outweighed those (for him, in this instance)"

I don't have a whole lot more to add to this. He lived in an interesting time period, but I didn't feel like he gave you much info on his context he often noted to the reader with the gist of, "I won't bore you with the details" which is often the part of the book I enjoy the most. Especially for a book like this, in which the character's actions are so much dependent on his context - I wanted more of it!

Another interesting note, what to make of use of the word "colored" nowadays? I had a friend refer to herself as "colored" the other day (she actually is...at least according to how the word used to be) and it didn't seem offensive to me at all, nor was she trying to be, or really even trying to be joking, it was more descriptive. Im NOT into re-claiming words, though Im not sure this one is one meant for or destined for reclaiming, it seems more to have gone out of Vogue (because YES, it was associated with many awful experiences for people of color, which seems to be the replacement phrase). Little of topic, and not going to get the space it deserves in this post, but some thoughts I had while reading this book.

"M" is still for Montgomery

So here is my review of my proper "M" book. Didn't seem right to assign myself a book I had already read, so I assigned the sequel (question: is it really a sequel when there are 10+ books in the series?) to myself but then felt the need to re-read the first book before starting the second.

Here is my initial review posted on my goodreads.com page (LOVE THAT WEBSITE PEOPLE!)

"Another great book with Anne of Green Gables. I was scared starting this book that it would be a letdown, like many sequels are, but it stayed quite well with what worked great in the first book - neat characters who play and grow. You still get a lot of the fun and silliness of Anne, though within an appropriate adult context, as she is now a school teacher. I do wish there was a little more Marilla in this book, because she is hilarious, but I can see that there is more to comes from this series and I am excited to keep reading"

I still agree. I have trouble describing how much these books take me back to the great parts of my childhood and bring back that young "imagination" that I feel like many adults lose in the worries of bills, jobs, kids, etc. Its not so much that it makes me think of some specific part of my childhood, but just that I read it then, and it reminds me of the things that I connected with then and renews my excites about those things, while giving me the opportunity to laugh at myself and find new parts of the book to connect with.

As a kid I loved Anne and connected with her in some ways - the way she loves to use big words and has red hair. Now I laugh at how similar I really was to her in some ways - mostly the big words and red hair (but also the DRAMA) and how STILL SIMILAR I am in many of those ways (really only my hair color has changed, let it be known, I was unwilling in that, it just happened).

I want to use more big words now. I feel my perspicacity has lessened now.

LOLZ.

Here is a link to the wordle I created based on the first chapter

title="Wordle: Anne of Avonlea"> src="http://www.wordle.net/thumb/wrdl/2988280/Anne_of_Avonlea"
alt="Wordle: Anne of Avonlea"
style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd">